Master's level 1 (L-M-D)
55 minutes


Source: Adams, J. R. and Barndt, S. E. "Organizational Life Cycle Implications for Major Projects." Project Management Quarterly, Vol. IX, No. 4, Dec. 1978, p. 32-39.
The evolution of project management has led to a fundamental shift in how success is measured and achieved. Understanding both approaches helps organizations make the transition effectively.
Traditional Approach
Focus on efficiency and short-term profitability, primarily measuring success through:
CSR Integration
Consider social and environmental impacts alongside financial metrics, incorporating:
By integrating CSR principles into project management, organizations can create sustainable value while maintaining operational excellence.
Traditional Projects
These projects add social and environmental goals to regular business activities. Examples include making buildings more energy efficient, reducing waste, and improving workplace safety. The goal is to do good while still running a successful business.
Responsible Innovation Projects
These projects create new solutions that help both society and business. Teams work together to develop products or services that solve social or environmental problems. For example, creating eco-friendly packaging, making banking easier for everyone, or designing products for people who are often overlooked.
Organizational Transformation Projects
These projects change how the entire company operates to become more sustainable. This means updating how things are done, changing company culture, and rethinking business practices. Examples include reducing waste through recycling programs, creating new leadership roles, and better tracking of environmental impact.
In the context of project management, the butterfly effect demonstrates how seemingly minor actions can generate significant impacts over time.
The Theory of Change (ToC) is a methodology that maps out the steps necessary to achieve a long-term goal. It answers the question: "How and why do we believe our actions will lead to the change we want to see?" ToC provides a visual and narrative framework for identifying key elements of a project.

The Theory of Change is invaluable for managing impact-based projects. It aligns team members and stakeholders on common goals, builds a culture of learning and adaptation, and ensures projects remain relevant and effective. By using ToC, impact project managers can confidently navigate uncertainty, measure success, and create sustainable, transformative change.
Clear objectives are crucial for project success.
Vague goals often lead to project failure.
Effective project objectives should follow the SMART framework to ensure success:
Each level builds upon the previous one, starting with specific definition and culminating in time-bound delivery.

A successful CSR strategy integrates all three types of objectives, building from a strong economic foundation through social impact to environmental sustainability.
A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a hierarchical decomposition of the project into smaller, more manageable components. It serves as the foundation for project planning, estimation, and control.
When creating a WBS, the 100% rule applies: the sum of all work at each level must equal 100% of the work necessary for project completion.

RBS structures project responsibilities by associating them with roles or departments within the organization. This hierarchical framework ensures clear accountability and prevents task overlap by mapping specific deliverables to organizational units or individual roles.
When implemented effectively, RBS becomes a vital tool for project managers to ensure all project components have clear ownership and that organizational resources are used efficiently.
This RACI matrix defines key roles and responsibilities for our sustainability initiative.

The OBS maps out how project responsibilities flow through different organizational levels, ensuring clear lines of authority and communication.

Each level of the OBS plays a crucial role in project success. General Management provides vision and resources, while the Steering Committee ensures alignment with organizational goals. Operational Teams handle the tactical execution, supported by External Contributors who bring specialized expertise.
CPM identifies essential tasks that determine the total duration of the project. The critical path consists of activities with no margin for error (zero float), meaning any delay in these tasks directly impacts the project completion date.
This method involves mapping all project activities and their dependencies in a network diagram, calculating the longest path through the network. Activities on the critical path require careful monitoring and proactive management of resources to prevent delays.
Project: 20% Carbon Footprint Reduction by 2026
|
Task |
Description |
Duration (days) |
Predecessors |
|
A |
CO₂ emissions audit |
10 |
- |
|
B |
Identification of major emission sources |
5 |
A |
|
C |
Benchmark of best practices |
7 |
A |
|
D |
Development of the action plan |
10 |
B, C |
|
E |
Plan approval by management |
5 |
D |
|
F |
Implementation of initial actions (energy, transport) |
15 |
E |
|
G |
Employee awareness campaign |
5 |
E |
|
H |
Monitoring and measurement of results |
10 |
F, G |
|
I |
Adjustment of actions |
7 |
H |
|
J |
Communication of results |
3 |
I |

The critical path consists of tasks where ES = LS and EF = LF, meaning those that have no flexibility.
The critical path is therefore: A → B → D → E → F → H → I → J
Total duration: 67 days Tasks C and G have some flexibility and are not part of the critical path
PERT is a statistical tool used in project management to estimate realistic project durations when facing uncertainty. Unlike single-point estimates, PERT uses three different time estimates to calculate a weighted average.
Estimated Duration = (O 4M P) / 6
This weighted average formula gives more importance to the Most Probable estimate (4x weight) while accounting for both best and worst-case scenarios. This approach helps project managers create more realistic schedules by considering uncertainty and risk.
|
Project: 20% Carbon Footprint Reduction by 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task |
Description |
Optimistic Duration (days) |
Most Likely Duration (days) |
Pessimistic Duration (days) |
Predecessors |
|
A |
CO₂ emissions audit |
8 |
10 |
12 |
- |
|
B |
Identification of major emission sources |
4 |
5 |
6 |
A |
|
C |
Benchmark of best practices |
6 |
7 |
8 |
A |
|
D |
Development of the action plan |
8 |
10 |
12 |
B, C |
|
E |
Plan approval by management |
4 |
5 |
6 |
D |
|
F |
Implementation of initial actions (energy, transport) |
12 |
15 |
18 |
E |
|
G |
Employee awareness campaign |
4 |
5 |
6 |
E |
|
H |
Monitoring and measurement of results |
8 |
10 |
12 |
F, G |
|
I |
Adjustment of actions |
6 |
7 |
8 |
H |
|
J |
Communication of results |
2 |
3 |
4 |
I |
Calculating PERT Duration
The expected duration (TE) for each task can be calculated using the PERT formula:


A → B → D → E → F → H → I → J (total 60 days)
A Gantt chart is a visual project management tool that displays tasks along a horizontal timeline, making it easier to track progress and dependencies.
Each task is represented by a horizontal bar whose length indicates its duration, with start and end dates clearly marked.
Key features of a Gantt chart include:
Project Brief: This project aims to analyze disparities in carbon emissions within an engineering company using data from the BDESE and TBS 2024. The goal is to detect potential inequalities, conduct a qualitative investigation, and propose corrective actions.
Teams and Timeline
Task Precedence Summary
|
Task |
Description |
Precedence |
|
T1 |
Data extraction and structuring |
None (Starts first) |
|
T2 |
Analysis of carbon emission disparities |
T1 |
|
T3 |
Qualitative survey on carbon practices |
T1 |
|
T4 |
Cross-referencing results with sector benchmarks |
T2, T3 |
|
T5 |
Writing recommendations on carbon policy |
T4 |
|
T6 |
Final presentation and stakeholder feedback |
T5 |
GANTT Chart

🔵 = Task in progress
Why Monitor the Budget?
Budget monitoring is the cornerstone of effective project management, allowing for complete control of financial resources.
In the context of CSR projects, this budgetary rigour demonstrates our commitment to combining economic performance and positive impact.
Planned Value (PV)
PV represents the budgeted cost of work scheduled at a given point in time. It establishes a performance measurement baseline that helps project managers track progress against the original plan.
Earned Value (EV)
EV measures the authorized work physically completed, expressed in terms of the budget assigned to that work. It provides objective progress measurements by converting completed deliverables into their budgeted dollar value. This allows us to determine if we're ahead or behind schedule.
Actual Cost (AC)
AC reflects the total cost actually incurred in accomplishing work during a given period. By comparing AC with EV and PV, project managers can identify cost variances and forecast final costs. This three-point analysis enables data-driven decisions about corrective actions and provides early warning signals of potential budget overruns or schedule delays.
Cost Variance (CV)
CV = EV - AC
For example, if our earned value is $245,000 (completed site prep and materials) but actual costs are $260,000, our CV is -$15,000, indicating we're over budget.
Schedule Variance (SV)
SV = EV - PV
If by week 8 we've only completed $200,000 worth of work when we planned for $245,000, our SV is -$45,000, showing we're behind schedule on our solar installation.
Cost Performance Index (CPI)
CPI = EV / AC
If we've earned $95,000 in solar panel installation value but spent $105,000, our CPI is 0.90, meaning we're getting $0.90 of value for every dollar spent, including our eco-friendly panel investment.
Dashboards
Real-time visualization of project metrics including earned value, cost variance, and schedule performance. Integration of sustainable development indicators with traditional project KPIs for comprehensive monitoring.
KPIs
Critical metrics including Cost Performance Index (CPI), Schedule Variance (SV), and milestone completion rates. Tracking both financial performance and sustainable development goals through quantifiable indicators.
CSR Indicators
Specialized metrics tracking environmental impact (carbon footprint reduction, renewable energy usage), social responsibility (community engagement, labor practices), and economic sustainability (local supplier integration, sustainable procurement rates).
A risk matrix helps identify, assess, and prioritize project risks based on their impact and probability. This visual tool enables project managers to make informed decisions about risk mitigation strategies.

Result Analysis
Check if we met our project goals by looking at numbers and overall outcomes. Review if we stayed within budget, finished on time, and delivered what we promised.
Feedback Collection
Ask team members, stakeholders, and users what they think through surveys and meetings. Getting feedback from everyone helps us understand what worked well and what we can do better next time.
Lessons Learned
Write down what we learned, including challenges we faced and solutions that worked well. Keep track of these insights to help plan and run future projects more effectively.
CSR Impact Evaluation
Look at how well we met our social and environmental goals. Check how we helped the community, reduced environmental impact, and created value for stakeholders. Note both expected and unexpected results to improve future sustainability projects.
Integrating CSR into project management is not just a trend, but a necessity for sustainable business practices and long-term success.
Don’t forget to watch the video course
Project for Impact, Planning, Management tools, Effective communication
Project Management: Is a structured approach to achieving specific goals within a defined timeframe and budget. Managing a project involves planning, organizing, and controlling resources to deliver what is planned. Therefore, It is essential to coordinate tasks and manage risks.
The principle of Non-linearity: Changes in projects do not always follow a linear progression. A small initial modification can trigger a series of exponential improvements.
The Theory of Change: It is a methodology that maps out the steps necessary to achieve a long-term goal : Inputs, Activities, Outputs, Outcomes, Impatcs.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Erasmus+ France / Education & Training Agency. Neither the European Union nor the Erasmus+ France / Education & Training Agency can be held responsible for them
Legal description – Creative Commons licensing: The materials published on the IMPACT ACADEMY project website are classified as Open Educational Resources' (OER) and can be freely (without permission of their creators): downloaded, used, reused, copied, adapted, and shared by users, with information about the source of their origin.